Ya, what a great thing.
Can't tell you how great I thought it was when my Android was left behind at release 2.2 and a boat load of related headaches. Ya that fragmentation is great.
View ArticleNOT!!!
Frangmentation had nothing to do with any of the reasons given.Android is open - And fragmented. Your telling me that if it wasn't fragmented, it wouldn't be open?The market is massive - Because of...
View ArticleLeft behind
So I guess you bought Vista, and Windows 8, instead of being "left behind" at XP or. 7, right?Sometimes the latest thing isn't so great for everybody.Besides, when you buy a phone, buy one that does...
View ArticleAgreed
I'm with you on this one. I don't see how the advantages listed are due to fragmentation.
View ArticleOh, good; it wasn't just me
I'm not an Android user, but I didn't see how many of these 'advantages' were related to fragmentation.If it wasn't open, it wouldn't be fragmented; not the other way around.The closed proprietary...
View ArticleCentrally planned systems work well in the beginning but
Centrally planned systems work well in the beginning (like Apple's iPad, iPod) but In a large environment, a Self-Directed development works better.Like your children, when they are born, you control...
View ArticleFragmentation isn't a positive
No matter how you slice it, it is annoying for everyone involved. But, as the article attempts to point out, the fragmentation is a side-effect of the very loose control that Google exerts. If they...
View ArticleDO NOT AGREE
The article is more about how to survive the fragmentation issue.But fragmentation is NOT GOOD, no matter what.Having different versions is a natural process. I lived through DOS XX.XX, windows 3.1,...
View ArticleWTF are you talking about
As pointed out by other but reiterated by me: Your article has nothing to do with Fragmentation beign good.You do point out some nice features of Android and Google, but these are not because of...
View Article
